Search for: "Morris v. Pfizer, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
A Pfizer Inc. unit must face a $1.5 million damage award over one of its menopause drugs, a Pennsylvania appeals court ruled. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Philip Morris Inc., 11 Cal. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
In Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2008 Phila. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case, Pfizer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Pfizer, Inc., 716 F.3d 1087, 1092-93 (8th Cir. 2013). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:54 am
March 6, 2012); Morris v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 837 A.2d 534, 541 (Pa. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Pfizer Inc., 196 F. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:06 pm
§ 337(a); Morris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Philip Morris, Inc., 209 P.3d 271, 274 (Nev. 2009); Leaf v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Morris v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Pfizer, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
MGM Grand Hotels, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (same; physician considered warning inappropriate) (applying California law).Under these facts, if Conte were an ordinary prescription drug product liability case, plaintiff would have been out of court and out of luck, just like Motus. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Pfizer, Inc., 724 F. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2011 WL 904161 (E.D. [read post]
